Clearpath vs accessiBe & AudioEye
accessiBe and AudioEye work mostly on the live site, with a script and, in AudioEye's managed plans, expert fixes. Clearpath works earlier: it scans every deploy against WCAG 2.2 AA in CI and files the fix as an issue, so the code itself gets fixed.
accessiBe & AudioEye, as published
accessiBe accessWidget: Micro $59/mo or $490/yr (up to 5,000 visits/mo), Growth $179/mo or $1,490/yr (30,000), Scale $479/mo or $3,990/yr (100,000), Enterprise custom; one domain per plan. AudioEye publishes three plans (Automated, Self-Managed, Managed) without listed prices.
Checked October 2026 · their pricing page
Clearpath
Free plan with unlimited CI scans; Starter $39/mo, Growth $149/mo, Scale $499/mo; Enterprise custom with self-host available.
See ClearpathSide by side
| accessiBe & AudioEye | Clearpath | |
|---|---|---|
| Where it works | On the live site, via script and managed services | In CI, on every deploy |
| Pricing basis | accessiBe: monthly visits per domain; AudioEye: quoted | Scans and projects; CI scans unlimited |
| Entry price | accessiBe from $59/mo | Free, then $39/mo |
| Output | Widget adjustments, reports, managed fixes | Actionable issues and an evidence trail |
| Best fit | Sites without engineering capacity to fix code | Teams that ship code and want regressions blocked |
Where accessiBe & AudioEye is better
- Nothing to change in your codebase to get started — a script goes on the live site
- AudioEye's managed plans include expert audits and custom-written fixes done for you
- Coverage of content your engineers never touch, such as CMS pages edited by marketing
- Vendor-run monitoring of the production site, not only of code in a pipeline
Where Clearpath is better
- Regressions are caught in the pull request, before they ship
- Findings are issues with the selector, the WCAG rule, and the fix — not a compliance score
- Priced by scans and projects, not by how many people visit your site
- A dated, exportable record of every scan for your legal team
So which one
Choose accessiBe & AudioEye if…
Choose AudioEye's managed plans if you have no engineers to fix issues and want experts to do it for you. Before relying on any automated tool alone, note that in April 2025 the US FTC finalised an order barring accessiBe from claiming its automated product makes sites WCAG-compliant without evidence to support it.
Choose Clearpath if…
Choose Clearpath if your team ships code and wants accessibility treated like any other test: checked on every pull request, fixed at the source, and documented with dated evidence.
Last reviewed 23 October 2026. If something here is out of date or wrong, tell us and we'll fix it — engineering@resolutexhq.com.
Other comparisons
Every price we charge is on one page, with no gate in front of it.